Lecture 17
Review
Given a sequence in , let . Calculate , , ... for the following sequences:
- : ,
- : ,
- : ,
- : ,
- : ,
New materials
Cauchy sequence
Theorem 3.11
(b) If is a compact metric space, then every Cauchy sequence in converges.
(c) In , every Cauchy sequence converges.
Proof:
(b) Let . Since is Cauchy, . By Theorem 3.10 (a), .
Since is compact, and is closed, by Theorem 2.35, is compact.
Since , . By Theorem 3.10(b), such that .
We claim that converges to . Let , there exists such that , .
For any , .
So , by definition of diameter.
Therefore, converges to .
(c) Let be a Cauchy sequence in .
By Theorem 3.9, is bounded. So such that for all . Moreover . and is closed and bounded. Thus by Theorem 2.41, is compact.
Note that Theorem 2.41 only works for .
So by (b), converges to some .
EOP
Definition 3.12
Let be a metric space. We say is complete if every Cauchy sequence in converges.
Theorem 3.11(b) can also be rephrased as:
is a compact metric space is complete.
Theorem 3.11(c) can also be rephrased as:
is complete.
Note: completeness is a property of the "universe" , not a property of any particular sequence in .
is not complete. is a Cauchy sequence in but it does not converge in .
Fact: If is complete and is a closed subset of , then is complete.
Definition 3.13
A sequence of real numbers is said to be
- monotone increasing if for all .
- monotone decreasing if for all .
- strictly monotone increasing if for all .
- strictly monotone decreasing if for all .
- monotone if it is either monotone increasing or monotone decreasing.
Example:
- is strictly monotone decreasing.
- is neither monotone increasing nor monotone decreasing.
Theorem 3.14
Suppose is monotonic. Then converges is bounded.
Proof:
If is monotonic and bounded, then by previous result, converges.
If is monotonic and converges, then by Theorem 3.2(c), is bounded.
EOP
Upper and lower limits
Definition 3.15 (Divergence to or )
Let be a sequence of real numbers with the following properties:
For every real number there is an integer such that implies . We then write
For every real number there is an integer such that implies . We then write .
for every real number, we can find a element in the sequence that is greater than or less than it
Definition 3.16
Let be a sequence of real numbers.
Let .
Let , .
We define and
Informally, is the largest possible value that a subsequence of can converge to.
Example:
, , , . and does not exist.
One advantage of and is that they always exist (they may be or ), even if the sequence does not converge.